Posted On: May 31, 2023

For decades the US government has been working on technology to allow them to beam thoughts into people's heads.

There's even concern that the technology exists and has been used against Americans.

Some of the research into Havana Syndrome showed that the symptoms ultimately overlapped with anomalous structures inside the brains of people who report “anomalous intuition” (psi):.

Although Nolan is quick to say that he isn't a brain expert by training, occasionally his biological research does involve such studies.

Several years ago, at the request of members of the intelligence community, he began looking into unusual health conditions afflicting several military and other government personnel.

This led Nolan to the discovery of unique features in a particular region of the brain, the caudate putamen, that appeared in the MRI scans of some of these individuals.

It had been the caudate putamen connection, Nolan says, that led to some of the earliest detections of anomalous health incidents that are now popularly known as Havana Syndrome.

However, that hadn't been all that interested Nolan about this research.

“It's actually a perfect example of the unexpected finding leading to something interesting, even if it wasn't necessarily where you were headed in the first place,” Nolan says.

“Yet it still circles back to things like remote viewing and perception, consciousness, all of these things,” Nolan says, adding that he hopes to gather enough data to be able to apply it toward furthering our understanding of such purported phenomena.

Science fiction has familiarized us with the concept of machines (or beings) projecting an image of themselves that systematically confuses observers.

One could imagine that UAP represent physical craft equipped with the means to interact both with the surrounding atmosphere and with the senses of observers in such a way as to convey a false image of their real nature.

One could argue that such an object could use microwave devices to create perceptual hallucinations in the witnesses (including messages that are heard by a single individual in a group).

Here once again we see the idea of microwaves being used to alter people's thoughts.

Now it's important to keep in mind that both Vallée and Davis have held security clearances in the past and have been heavily involved in doing UAP research for the USG for decades.

So, we have many different sources that support the idea that UAP can make people see things that aren't real.

This goes from a simple UAP sighting all the way up to people claiming they've been abducted by mantis beings (yours truly).

But that doesn't account for the physical component of UAP, and we know there is one.

The objects have been photographed and caught on video.

There are physical traces after purported landings.

The same Eric Davis that co-wrote the paper with Vallée is acknowledged by many to be one of the recent whistleblowers to testify before Congress about UAP crash retrievals.

You can't retrieve craft that don't exist.

So they have the ability to make people see things that aren't there, changing the way the real objects may appear.

Their true nature can be masked. But what if it's more complicated than that?

Here's an excerpt from the conclusion from “Passport to Magonia,” Vallée's seminal work: .

There exists a natural phenomenon whose manifestations border on both the physical and the mental.

There is a medium in which human dreams can be implemented, and this is the mechanism by which UFO events are generated, needing no superior intelligence to trigger them.

This would explain the fugitivity of UFO manifestations, the alleged contact with friendly occupants, and the fact that the objects appear to keep pace with human technology and to use current symbols.

The theory explains the behavior of the “visitors”: aggressive in Latin America, “Cartesian” in France, “alien monsters” in the United States, etc.

It also, naturally, explains the totality of religious miracles as well as ghosts and other so-called supernatural phenomena.

It's very well-known among contact/abduction researchers that there's a very strong link between the subconscious of the experiencer and the things they report experiencing during these encounters.

The concept of “manifesting dreams” is apt, but keep in mind that many cases happen while the person is wide awake, sometimes with co-witnesses who share the experience.

This is one reason why Vallée and Davis proposed in their paper that our reality may not be structured the way we think it is. That there exists an ability to physically manifest psychical objects.

In other words, the beings behind the UAP phenomenon may not just have the ability to project visions into people's heads, or read their thoughts, but to then take that information and generate real, physical experiences with it.

His case was heavily investigated and everyone agreed that Simonton was sincere in his report, he believed what he experienced.

The ludicrous nature of it is perfectly in keeping with what Experiencers frequently report.

And yet there was physical evidence of the encounter, although it didn't show anything exotic (and this kind of trace evidence almost never does).

There is a well-known list of people who have been involved in UAP research for the government, a few being Jacques Vallée, Eric Davis, Garry Nolan, Hal Puthoff, Lue Elizondo, Jay Stratton, and Colm Kelleher.

Many of them have given interviews on these subjects and they are unanimous in their beliefs that there is something to “the woo.” The idea that our understanding of the physical world as defined by materialism is wrong, or at least incomplete.

There's also what's called the “Invisible College,” which is a group of influential thinkers who meet in private to discuss these ideas and related topics.

Many of them claim to be Experiencers themselves, according to Diana Pasulka in her book “American Cosmic”:.

There are public ufologists who are known for their work, there are a few academics who write about the topic, and then there is an “Invisible College,” as Allen Hynek called it and of which Jacques Vallee wrote, a group of scientists, academics, and others who will never make their work public, or at least not for a long time, although the results of their investigations impact society in many ways.

She goes into great detail about the views of these members, many of which are completely outside of the materialist paradigm. In other words, 100% “woo.”.

In Lue Elizondo's redacted IG complaint he alleged that during a meeting within the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense and Intelligence back in 2009 it was said to him that all investigations and research into the phenomenon should end immediately because UAP have "supernatural origins not consistent with certain religious views of specific senior leadership." .

Note that: Senior Leadership in government believe that UAP are supernatural. It's not a fringe position, it's a primary position. It's been stated over and over again by nearly all the people involved involved.

The argument the skeptics propose against this is that there's “no evidence” for it. It's patently untrue. There's hundreds of thousands of pages of UAP reports that support it.

The best scientists working on the subject have effectively unanimously agreed on it, and scientists work entirely off evidence.

The argument is primarily specious because it is based on the false belief that the public would have access to any of the evidence on UAP, ignoring the well-accepted fact that the government collects any such evidence and threatens or intimidates eyewitnesses.

So the idea that the general public will have access to any of this is information is ridiculous.

But there is a group of people in the public who do have knowledge, the same group that was studied to obtain much of the information the government had been working off of, namely Experiencers themselves.

A single account from a random person is an anecdote. It has little evidentiary value. An account from someone with higher credibility or expertise is considered testimony, and it has higher evidentiary value.

When you get many such accounts they become data used to form a scientific hypothesis.

This is well accepted in scientific circles, but is once again being erroneously used by the skeptics to dismiss the evidence.

The data from Experiencers supports the claims of the experts.

That's not surprising because they're fundamentally working from the same data set, although the experts also have access to the best (classified) evidence.

So when people say “we have no knowledge of the truth regarding UAP” it's another specious claim.

The collated reports from Experiencers give a pretty strong picture of the phenomenon.

This is why they are being invited to participate in research being done both inside and outside the government.

The non-materialist aspects (the woo) of UAP are not a subset, a side branch, a false lead, or anything other than the primary data surrounding UAP.

Arthur C. Clarke famously stated “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”.

That's all the woo is, future science.

It's time for people to let go of their biases and start actually listening to the experts on these subjects. Start with the scientists who have been studying it and had access to the classified data.

Then research the concepts they are discussing, many of which have empirical evidence to support them.

If you want to peek behind the curtain at what might be going on beyond just the nuts and bolts, read the books by scientists like John Mack who studied the firsthand accounts.

What you shouldn't waste your time on is the anti-intellectuals who believe that they consistently know better than the experts.

The nuts and bolts of UAP is just the starting line, but the finish line is in sight, and there's no good reason to not move forward with our discussions and expectations of what's to come.

Post from user MantisAwakening at at reddit.

Posted On: May 31, 2023

For decades the US government has been working on technology to allow them to beam thoughts into people's heads.

There's even concern that the technology exists and has been used against Americans.

Some of the research into Havana Syndrome showed that the symptoms ultimately overlapped with anomalous structures inside the brains of people who report “anomalous intuition” (psi):.

Although Nolan is quick to say that he isn't a brain expert by training, occasionally his biological research does involve such studies.

Several years ago, at the request of members of the intelligence community, he began looking into unusual health conditions afflicting several military and other government personnel.

This led Nolan to the discovery of unique features in a particular region of the brain, the caudate putamen, that appeared in the MRI scans of some of these individuals.

It had been the caudate putamen connection, Nolan says, that led to some of the earliest detections of anomalous health incidents that are now popularly known as Havana Syndrome.

However, that hadn't been all that interested Nolan about this research.

“It's actually a perfect example of the unexpected finding leading to something interesting, even if it wasn't necessarily where you were headed in the first place,” Nolan says.

“Yet it still circles back to things like remote viewing and perception, consciousness, all of these things,” Nolan says, adding that he hopes to gather enough data to be able to apply it toward furthering our understanding of such purported phenomena.

Science fiction has familiarized us with the concept of machines (or beings) projecting an image of themselves that systematically confuses observers.

One could imagine that UAP represent physical craft equipped with the means to interact both with the surrounding atmosphere and with the senses of observers in such a way as to convey a false image of their real nature.

One could argue that such an object could use microwave devices to create perceptual hallucinations in the witnesses (including messages that are heard by a single individual in a group).

Here once again we see the idea of microwaves being used to alter people's thoughts.

Now it's important to keep in mind that both Vallée and Davis have held security clearances in the past and have been heavily involved in doing UAP research for the USG for decades.

So, we have many different sources that support the idea that UAP can make people see things that aren't real.

This goes from a simple UAP sighting all the way up to people claiming they've been abducted by mantis beings (yours truly).

But that doesn't account for the physical component of UAP, and we know there is one.

The objects have been photographed and caught on video.

There are physical traces after purported landings.

The same Eric Davis that co-wrote the paper with Vallée is acknowledged by many to be one of the recent whistleblowers to testify before Congress about UAP crash retrievals.

You can't retrieve craft that don't exist.

So they have the ability to make people see things that aren't there, changing the way the real objects may appear.

Their true nature can be masked. But what if it's more complicated than that?

Here's an excerpt from the conclusion from “Passport to Magonia,” Vallée's seminal work: .

There exists a natural phenomenon whose manifestations border on both the physical and the mental.

There is a medium in which human dreams can be implemented, and this is the mechanism by which UFO events are generated, needing no superior intelligence to trigger them.

This would explain the fugitivity of UFO manifestations, the alleged contact with friendly occupants, and the fact that the objects appear to keep pace with human technology and to use current symbols.

The theory explains the behavior of the “visitors”: aggressive in Latin America, “Cartesian” in France, “alien monsters” in the United States, etc.

It also, naturally, explains the totality of religious miracles as well as ghosts and other so-called supernatural phenomena.

It's very well-known among contact/abduction researchers that there's a very strong link between the subconscious of the experiencer and the things they report experiencing during these encounters.

The concept of “manifesting dreams” is apt, but keep in mind that many cases happen while the person is wide awake, sometimes with co-witnesses who share the experience.

This is one reason why Vallée and Davis proposed in their paper that our reality may not be structured the way we think it is. That there exists an ability to physically manifest psychical objects.

In other words, the beings behind the UAP phenomenon may not just have the ability to project visions into people's heads, or read their thoughts, but to then take that information and generate real, physical experiences with it.

His case was heavily investigated and everyone agreed that Simonton was sincere in his report, he believed what he experienced.

The ludicrous nature of it is perfectly in keeping with what Experiencers frequently report.

And yet there was physical evidence of the encounter, although it didn't show anything exotic (and this kind of trace evidence almost never does).

There is a well-known list of people who have been involved in UAP research for the government, a few being Jacques Vallée, Eric Davis, Garry Nolan, Hal Puthoff, Lue Elizondo, Jay Stratton, and Colm Kelleher.

Many of them have given interviews on these subjects and they are unanimous in their beliefs that there is something to “the woo.” The idea that our understanding of the physical world as defined by materialism is wrong, or at least incomplete.

There's also what's called the “Invisible College,” which is a group of influential thinkers who meet in private to discuss these ideas and related topics.

Many of them claim to be Experiencers themselves, according to Diana Pasulka in her book “American Cosmic”:.

There are public ufologists who are known for their work, there are a few academics who write about the topic, and then there is an “Invisible College,” as Allen Hynek called it and of which Jacques Vallee wrote, a group of scientists, academics, and others who will never make their work public, or at least not for a long time, although the results of their investigations impact society in many ways.

She goes into great detail about the views of these members, many of which are completely outside of the materialist paradigm. In other words, 100% “woo.”.

In Lue Elizondo's redacted IG complaint he alleged that during a meeting within the Office of the Undersecretary of Defense and Intelligence back in 2009 it was said to him that all investigations and research into the phenomenon should end immediately because UAP have "supernatural origins not consistent with certain religious views of specific senior leadership." .

Note that: Senior Leadership in government believe that UAP are supernatural. It's not a fringe position, it's a primary position. It's been stated over and over again by nearly all the people involved involved.

The argument the skeptics propose against this is that there's “no evidence” for it. It's patently untrue. There's hundreds of thousands of pages of UAP reports that support it.

The best scientists working on the subject have effectively unanimously agreed on it, and scientists work entirely off evidence.

The argument is primarily specious because it is based on the false belief that the public would have access to any of the evidence on UAP, ignoring the well-accepted fact that the government collects any such evidence and threatens or intimidates eyewitnesses.

So the idea that the general public will have access to any of this is information is ridiculous.

But there is a group of people in the public who do have knowledge, the same group that was studied to obtain much of the information the government had been working off of, namely Experiencers themselves.

A single account from a random person is an anecdote. It has little evidentiary value. An account from someone with higher credibility or expertise is considered testimony, and it has higher evidentiary value.

When you get many such accounts they become data used to form a scientific hypothesis.

This is well accepted in scientific circles, but is once again being erroneously used by the skeptics to dismiss the evidence.

The data from Experiencers supports the claims of the experts.

That's not surprising because they're fundamentally working from the same data set, although the experts also have access to the best (classified) evidence.

So when people say “we have no knowledge of the truth regarding UAP” it's another specious claim.

The collated reports from Experiencers give a pretty strong picture of the phenomenon.

This is why they are being invited to participate in research being done both inside and outside the government.

The non-materialist aspects (the woo) of UAP are not a subset, a side branch, a false lead, or anything other than the primary data surrounding UAP.

Arthur C. Clarke famously stated “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic”.

That's all the woo is, future science.

It's time for people to let go of their biases and start actually listening to the experts on these subjects. Start with the scientists who have been studying it and had access to the classified data.

Then research the concepts they are discussing, many of which have empirical evidence to support them.

If you want to peek behind the curtain at what might be going on beyond just the nuts and bolts, read the books by scientists like John Mack who studied the firsthand accounts.

What you shouldn't waste your time on is the anti-intellectuals who believe that they consistently know better than the experts.

The nuts and bolts of UAP is just the starting line, but the finish line is in sight, and there's no good reason to not move forward with our discussions and expectations of what's to come.

Post from user MantisAwakening at at reddit.