Posted On: February 23, 2023

Maybe it's me but it seems like there are more than a few folks out there who put entirely too much weight on stick structures as potential sasquatch evidence. I have always felt this is one of the flimsiest forms of so called evidence for a number of reasons. The first reason is that I have yet to hear a single anecdotal story, let alone something more concrete where someone has actually claimed to see a sasquatch do this kind of thing. This places the whole stick thing is a world of pointless speculation without substance. People have speculated that they are territorial markers, means of communication, etc, etc, but with nothing whatsoever to back any of it up, nothing.

From my own frame of reference, if you were to walk through any one of the areas I check on with any frequency, and took into account what could pass for stick structures, you would think there was a sasquatch behind every single tree, yet oddly, there isn't. 98% of this stuff is nothing than tree bits that the wind knocked over and dead tree bits fell off or can likewise be naturally explained. Granted then you find odder stuff to, twists, and elaborate so called structures, but it's funny how many of these elaborate structures are within ten feet of an established hiking trail, coincidence? Not likely since the likely cause is human. I'd also put rock stacking in the human area as well. It's telling how many driveways have stacked rocks as decorations on the way to these areas.

Just in the last two weeks I have heard the argument that "no human is strong enough to have twisted this", bullshit.. in the sense that if a human didn't do it, it must be bigfoot. That's just someone seeing what they want to, i.e., fantasy land. More than one human working with team work could twist, break or what have you, and it's lot more likely that a group of people, such as hunters collaborated on a debree hut/blind, or a bunch kids built a fort in the woods, than bigfoot breaking up the wood work mere feet from a hiking trail.

All this stuff is in the vast majority of time, is a failure to consider the most likely cause first in favor of the fantasy they prefer. And that isn't helping anything.

Post from user [deleted] at sasquatchresearch at reddit.com.

Posted On: February 23, 2023

Maybe it's me but it seems like there are more than a few folks out there who put entirely too much weight on stick structures as potential sasquatch evidence. I have always felt this is one of the flimsiest forms of so called evidence for a number of reasons. The first reason is that I have yet to hear a single anecdotal story, let alone something more concrete where someone has actually claimed to see a sasquatch do this kind of thing. This places the whole stick thing is a world of pointless speculation without substance. People have speculated that they are territorial markers, means of communication, etc, etc, but with nothing whatsoever to back any of it up, nothing.

From my own frame of reference, if you were to walk through any one of the areas I check on with any frequency, and took into account what could pass for stick structures, you would think there was a sasquatch behind every single tree, yet oddly, there isn't. 98% of this stuff is nothing than tree bits that the wind knocked over and dead tree bits fell off or can likewise be naturally explained. Granted then you find odder stuff to, twists, and elaborate so called structures, but it's funny how many of these elaborate structures are within ten feet of an established hiking trail, coincidence? Not likely since the likely cause is human. I'd also put rock stacking in the human area as well. It's telling how many driveways have stacked rocks as decorations on the way to these areas.

Just in the last two weeks I have heard the argument that "no human is strong enough to have twisted this", bullshit.. in the sense that if a human didn't do it, it must be bigfoot. That's just someone seeing what they want to, i.e., fantasy land. More than one human working with team work could twist, break or what have you, and it's lot more likely that a group of people, such as hunters collaborated on a debree hut/blind, or a bunch kids built a fort in the woods, than bigfoot breaking up the wood work mere feet from a hiking trail.

All this stuff is in the vast majority of time, is a failure to consider the most likely cause first in favor of the fantasy they prefer. And that isn't helping anything.

Post from user [deleted] at sasquatchresearch at reddit.com.