Posted On: June 14, 2023

"Attorneys from the Compass Rose Legal Group, who represented whistleblower David Grusch in his complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) regarding harassment he says he received during his investigation of a supposed UAP crash retrieval program within the Department of Defense, have issued a statement saying they have ended their formal association with the former intelligence officer.".

Are the attorneys for David Grouch distancing themselves after being interviewed by Newsmax? They've released the statement only four days after the first interview aired. Also made a point to say :.

"The whistleblower disclosure did not speak to the specifics of the alleged classified information that Mr. Grusch has now publicly characterized, and the substance of that information has always been outside of the scope of Compass Rose's representation".

In no way am I trying to discredit Grusch's claims, because I believe he's being genuine. I was just confused with the timing of the press release from Compass. UserofDAN pointed me to the recent NEWSMAX interview which makes sense as to why the press release.

SigInt-Samurai666 Pointed out that Compass Rose were just correcting the information that they were representing him on the retaliation complaint and not the classified information which they were being inundated with to many press calls about. A former lawyer who worked for Compass Rose who perviously worked for the ICIG is handling the confidential materials being turned over to congress.

Thanks to those who helped with the clarification! To those who just downvoted I was genuinely curious as to why and I believe others will be too. Should upvote so those who may also be confused may see this thread, because there are currently a lot of articles using the press release as a means to discredit Grusch!.

Post from user emitniny at at reddit.

Posted On: June 14, 2023

"Attorneys from the Compass Rose Legal Group, who represented whistleblower David Grusch in his complaint to the Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) regarding harassment he says he received during his investigation of a supposed UAP crash retrieval program within the Department of Defense, have issued a statement saying they have ended their formal association with the former intelligence officer.".

Are the attorneys for David Grouch distancing themselves after being interviewed by Newsmax? They've released the statement only four days after the first interview aired. Also made a point to say :.

"The whistleblower disclosure did not speak to the specifics of the alleged classified information that Mr. Grusch has now publicly characterized, and the substance of that information has always been outside of the scope of Compass Rose's representation".

In no way am I trying to discredit Grusch's claims, because I believe he's being genuine. I was just confused with the timing of the press release from Compass. UserofDAN pointed me to the recent NEWSMAX interview which makes sense as to why the press release.

SigInt-Samurai666 Pointed out that Compass Rose were just correcting the information that they were representing him on the retaliation complaint and not the classified information which they were being inundated with to many press calls about. A former lawyer who worked for Compass Rose who perviously worked for the ICIG is handling the confidential materials being turned over to congress.

Thanks to those who helped with the clarification! To those who just downvoted I was genuinely curious as to why and I believe others will be too. Should upvote so those who may also be confused may see this thread, because there are currently a lot of articles using the press release as a means to discredit Grusch!.

Post from user emitniny at at reddit.