Posted On: November 24, 2023

The pro disclosure team on the Hill could take advantage of the term NHI in the Schumer bill ndaa amendment act to pass the law, with the idea of letting think the peoples in the Senate who are poorly or uninformed about ufology that is just some formality for regulating AI.

I saw a few days ago on this sub, someone making a post about Matt Laslo from Askapol who was rather perplexed by certain responses he received recently at the capitol.

After watching the interview in which he appeared (I really don't remember the link and I can't find it, sorry).

He explains, basically, that interest had died down and that people like Rubio were recently saying that the Schumer bill ndaa amendment act was not what we thought and that it was to regulate AI.

So I said to myself when I listened to that that it didn't make any sense! after everything we've been through this year, we couldn't be made to believe that it was us who were wrong, after all Shumer himself insinuated that it was to follow in Harry Reid's footsteps and give him back a tribute.

That's where it clicked!.

We all know that all members of the governments of the world are interested in what's getting them re-elected right?.

Or increase their influence or reputation, but the subject of UFO didn't help their carrier so they didnt want to talk about that(fortunately it is starting to become a less taboo subject) .

So, for the member of the senate who are not aware of the UFO sphere and didn't want to be associated with it, i think what the pro disclosure and Schumer Bill is doing is utilize the broad term NHI for pretending to talking about AI for better presenting the bill for the non UFO cultivated member of congress/senate .

By using the term NHI, we can make it easier for them to pass the proposed laws since they have never explicitly said to them that we are talking about ET, "no your are mistaken, we didn't talk about ET, just some AI".

Remember, we only see government people who are in our sphere but how many don't even know it's a hot topic?.

We complain about AARO, but how many members of the government know what it does?.

We overestimate the malicious intentions of the government as a whole, for the most part it is just poorly informed and unfortunately closed-minded people.

Imagin a lazy and self centric politician, is easier for him to recognize AI as a tangible treat in place of "supposed" UFO in didn't hear about in the NYT as opposed to AI who everyone talk about and freak out about a regulation.

That's why the actors in the Senate are being discreet and changing their tone!.

We don't want the average politician and voter to panic! Lay low, make it passe for a blant formality about some AI regulation and tada, 6 months later you start to declassify everything related to UFO's.

I'm really sorry, I wrote this quickly, just when I was thinking about it, I don't have much time to refine it, but I had to get the general idea, as vague as it may be, out of my head!.

Post from user Syhel at at reddit.

Comments:

Honestly man, I think that even us UFO topic enthusiasts are behind on the matter.

I think this issue is a lot bigger than we think, and I think that a whole lot more people on the Hill are aware of it than we think.

Remember we have whistleblowers going directly to Congress regularly now days.

Some of them are straight up touched the craft type witnesses, and some are much less involved, but I really think that itd surprise us if we could hear some of the conversations that are going on between Congress members, and even the Whitehouse.

That said, we still have to call and write to members on the House side, and give Congressmen Mike Turner and Mike Rogers as much shit as possible.

Check out their Twitters, its pretty funny.

Comment from user LimpCroissant at at reddit.

Posted On: November 24, 2023

The pro disclosure team on the Hill could take advantage of the term NHI in the Schumer bill ndaa amendment act to pass the law, with the idea of letting think the peoples in the Senate who are poorly or uninformed about ufology that is just some formality for regulating AI.

I saw a few days ago on this sub, someone making a post about Matt Laslo from Askapol who was rather perplexed by certain responses he received recently at the capitol.

After watching the interview in which he appeared (I really don't remember the link and I can't find it, sorry).

He explains, basically, that interest had died down and that people like Rubio were recently saying that the Schumer bill ndaa amendment act was not what we thought and that it was to regulate AI.

So I said to myself when I listened to that that it didn't make any sense! after everything we've been through this year, we couldn't be made to believe that it was us who were wrong, after all Shumer himself insinuated that it was to follow in Harry Reid's footsteps and give him back a tribute.

That's where it clicked!.

We all know that all members of the governments of the world are interested in what's getting them re-elected right?.

Or increase their influence or reputation, but the subject of UFO didn't help their carrier so they didnt want to talk about that(fortunately it is starting to become a less taboo subject) .

So, for the member of the senate who are not aware of the UFO sphere and didn't want to be associated with it, i think what the pro disclosure and Schumer Bill is doing is utilize the broad term NHI for pretending to talking about AI for better presenting the bill for the non UFO cultivated member of congress/senate .

By using the term NHI, we can make it easier for them to pass the proposed laws since they have never explicitly said to them that we are talking about ET, "no your are mistaken, we didn't talk about ET, just some AI".

Remember, we only see government people who are in our sphere but how many don't even know it's a hot topic?.

We complain about AARO, but how many members of the government know what it does?.

We overestimate the malicious intentions of the government as a whole, for the most part it is just poorly informed and unfortunately closed-minded people.

Imagin a lazy and self centric politician, is easier for him to recognize AI as a tangible treat in place of "supposed" UFO in didn't hear about in the NYT as opposed to AI who everyone talk about and freak out about a regulation.

That's why the actors in the Senate are being discreet and changing their tone!.

We don't want the average politician and voter to panic! Lay low, make it passe for a blant formality about some AI regulation and tada, 6 months later you start to declassify everything related to UFO's.

I'm really sorry, I wrote this quickly, just when I was thinking about it, I don't have much time to refine it, but I had to get the general idea, as vague as it may be, out of my head!.

Post from user Syhel at at reddit.

Comments:

Honestly man, I think that even us UFO topic enthusiasts are behind on the matter.

I think this issue is a lot bigger than we think, and I think that a whole lot more people on the Hill are aware of it than we think.

Remember we have whistleblowers going directly to Congress regularly now days.

Some of them are straight up touched the craft type witnesses, and some are much less involved, but I really think that itd surprise us if we could hear some of the conversations that are going on between Congress members, and even the Whitehouse.

That said, we still have to call and write to members on the House side, and give Congressmen Mike Turner and Mike Rogers as much shit as possible.

Check out their Twitters, its pretty funny.

Comment from user LimpCroissant at at reddit.