Blog Categories
- African Incidents
- Atlantis Incidents
- Australian Incidents
- Belgian Incidents
- Bermuda Triangle Incidents
- Brazilian Incidents
- Canadian Incidents
- Chinese Incidents
- European Incidents
- France Incidents
- Ghosts
- Giants
- Italy Incidents
- Japanese Incidents
- Middle East Incidents
- Portugal Incidents
- Project Serpo
- Puerto Rico Incidents
- Russian Incidents
- Sasquatch
- Scandinavia Incidents
- Spanish Incidents
- UFOs
- United Kingdom Incidents
- United States Incidents
The Government Group Behind the UFO Crash Retrieval Program and Cover-Up
I think something David Grusch said during the News Nation interview was a big hint at figuring out the government body responsible for the UAP crash retrieval program and it's cover-up.
All the following information is freely available on Wikipedia but I am basing my connections off of Grusch's account of the Italian craft retrieval.
TL;DR: The group behind the behind the UAP crash retrieval and cover-up program is the CIA's Special Activities Center (SAC).
In the New Nation interview, Grusch claims he was only allowed to discuss a single craft retrieval case, the one from Italy in 1944-45. He said this was performed by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).
Removing a craft from an enemy country would most likely have been performed by their paramilitary unit.
So what happened to the OSS? At the time, the OSS was the only centralized intelligence organization in the US government, as it was created during WWII for intelligence coordination.
A month after the war concluded, the OSS was dissolved with it's duties split into different agencies.
The Department of State took on the Research and Analysis elements.
And the Department of War took on the Intelligence and Espionage elements. This would become it's own agency in July 1947, called the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
But here is the interesting part: there is a division within the CIA called the Special Activities Center (SAC).
This division is the direct descendant of the paramilitary component of the OSS, the same that likely retrieved the craft from Italy.
So lets look closer at the SAC.
It is comprised the Special Operations Group (SOG) and the Political Action Group (PAG).
The SAC/SOG is considered the most secretive special operations force within the United States.
Their members don't wear uniforms and, if compromised, the US government may deny all knowledge of their actions.
This group in involved with black ops, covert ops, espionage, high-value targets, raiding and assassination.
The other group, the SAC/PAG, is involved is psyops and cyberwarfare.
So this group within the CIA, the Special Activities Center (SAC):.
- Is the direct descendent of the same paramilitary that performed the first non-human craft retrieval.
- contains a group that performs the most secretive operations on behalf of the U-S.
- contains another group that specializes in psyops and cyberwarfare.
- operates anonymously and publicly unacknowledged by the US Government.
This would also be why Grusch can talk about the Italian case: it was not performed by the current operation.
This is also why he nor any current/former officials will say this organization's name in public: one with the clearance to officially know this information would be bound by their top secret clearance to not acknowledge this group's activities.
To divulge information of this level could easily be considered treason.
If we are to believe Grusch, then I think this is an interesting connection regarding his account of the Italian craft retrieval, in particular the OSS's involvement.
The CIA's SAC seems like the exact group that could pull off a clandestine craft retrieval, intimidation and cover-up program.
They have all the markings of it.
They have all the capabilities necessary.
They perform the most secretive operations in the U-S, if not the world.
They may have even inherited the protocol for UAP crash retrieval from their predecessor.
Could they be the ones orchestrating the operation?.
Post from user KillingTime6 at at reddit.
Comments:
What a thought provoking post.
I am very pleased with research put into this.
You're a gentleman and a scholar.
I will need to take the night and gather my thoughts, but you may be on to something.
Very interesting..
Comment from user BiasRedditor at at reddit.
I think something David Grusch said during the News Nation interview was a big hint at figuring out the government body responsible for the UAP crash retrieval program and it's cover-up.
All the following information is freely available on Wikipedia but I am basing my connections off of Grusch's account of the Italian craft retrieval.
TL;DR: The group behind the behind the UAP crash retrieval and cover-up program is the CIA's Special Activities Center (SAC).
In the New Nation interview, Grusch claims he was only allowed to discuss a single craft retrieval case, the one from Italy in 1944-45. He said this was performed by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS).
Removing a craft from an enemy country would most likely have been performed by their paramilitary unit.
So what happened to the OSS? At the time, the OSS was the only centralized intelligence organization in the US government, as it was created during WWII for intelligence coordination.
A month after the war concluded, the OSS was dissolved with it's duties split into different agencies.
The Department of State took on the Research and Analysis elements.
And the Department of War took on the Intelligence and Espionage elements. This would become it's own agency in July 1947, called the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).
But here is the interesting part: there is a division within the CIA called the Special Activities Center (SAC).
This division is the direct descendant of the paramilitary component of the OSS, the same that likely retrieved the craft from Italy.
So lets look closer at the SAC.
It is comprised the Special Operations Group (SOG) and the Political Action Group (PAG).
The SAC/SOG is considered the most secretive special operations force within the United States.
Their members don't wear uniforms and, if compromised, the US government may deny all knowledge of their actions.
This group in involved with black ops, covert ops, espionage, high-value targets, raiding and assassination.
The other group, the SAC/PAG, is involved is psyops and cyberwarfare.
So this group within the CIA, the Special Activities Center (SAC):.
- Is the direct descendent of the same paramilitary that performed the first non-human craft retrieval.
- contains a group that performs the most secretive operations on behalf of the U-S.
- contains another group that specializes in psyops and cyberwarfare.
- operates anonymously and publicly unacknowledged by the US Government.
This would also be why Grusch can talk about the Italian case: it was not performed by the current operation.
This is also why he nor any current/former officials will say this organization's name in public: one with the clearance to officially know this information would be bound by their top secret clearance to not acknowledge this group's activities.
To divulge information of this level could easily be considered treason.
If we are to believe Grusch, then I think this is an interesting connection regarding his account of the Italian craft retrieval, in particular the OSS's involvement.
The CIA's SAC seems like the exact group that could pull off a clandestine craft retrieval, intimidation and cover-up program.
They have all the markings of it.
They have all the capabilities necessary.
They perform the most secretive operations in the U-S, if not the world.
They may have even inherited the protocol for UAP crash retrieval from their predecessor.
Could they be the ones orchestrating the operation?.
Post from user KillingTime6 at at reddit.
Comments:
What a thought provoking post.
I am very pleased with research put into this.
You're a gentleman and a scholar.
I will need to take the night and gather my thoughts, but you may be on to something.
Very interesting..
Comment from user BiasRedditor at at reddit.